Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Success! Now Check Your Email

To complete Subscribe, click the confirmation link in your inbox. If it doesn’t arrive within 3 minutes, check your spam folder.

Ok, Thanks

Gurugram Court Orders ₹650 Crore SRS Restitution to Homebuyers

CBIA Team profile image
by CBIA Team
Feature image
CBIA thanks Thirdman for the photo

A special court in Gurugram has ordered the restitution of immovable properties valued at roughly ₹650 crore to more than 2,300 homebuyers, marking a critical step in a long-running financial fraud case. The order, issued on March 11 under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), directs that assets linked to the SRS Group be returned to victims. The case centers on allegations that the real estate firm diverted funds raised from the public for housing projects, leaving thousands of investors in the lurch.

Background and Context

The investigation into the SRS Group reveals a familiar pattern of alleged mismanagement and fraud within India’s real estate sector. According to the Enforcement Directorate (ED), the scheme originated from 81 First Information Reports (FIRs) filed across Faridabad, Delhi, and by the Central Bureau of Investigation. These reports accuse the group of cheating homebuyers, plot purchasers, and financial institutions of approximately ₹2,200 crore.

Investigators allege that the group, operating in real estate and finance, collected funds from investors with promises of high returns on projects such as SRS City, SRS Pearl Floor, and SRS Residency. Instead of developing the properties, the ED claims the money was deposited into hundreds of shell companies created by the group and subsequently laundered. This diversion of funds left projects incomplete and financial commitments unmet.

Key Figures and Entities

The legal proceedings have focused on three primary accused individuals: Praveen Kumar Kapoor, Sunil Jindal, and Jitender Garg. According to court records and agency statements, the trio played central roles in the operations now under scrutiny.

The efforts to apprehend the accused have involved international cooperation. Kapoor was denied entry at Newark International Airport in the United States and deported to India on Nov. 2, 2025. He is currently lodged in Neemka Jail in Faridabad. Meanwhile, the special court declared Sunil Jindal and Jitender Garg fugitive economic offenders by an order dated Jan. 15, 2026, a designation aimed at preventing accused individuals from evading the legal process.

While asset attachment is a standard preliminary step in financial crime investigations, the transition from seizure to victim restitution is complex and often protracted. The ED had previously issued a provisional attachment order covering properties worth ₹2,215.98 crore and filed a prosecution complaint in August 2022.

The significance of the March 11 order lies in its directive to transfer attached properties directly to “genuine homebuyers.” Prior to this ruling, the agency had successfully restituted 78 flats worth ₹20.15 crore. With the new order, the total value of restoration in the case has reached approximately ₹670 crore. This move attempts to untangle the “proceeds of crime” from the web of litigation to provide tangible relief to those who suffered financial loss.

International Implications and Policy Response

The SRS case highlights the expanding toolkit available to Indian authorities for pursuing financial crime across borders. The utilization of the Fugitive Economic Offenders Act against Jindal and Garg, alongside the deportation of Kapoor from the US, underscores a coordinated effort to close loopholes that allow economic offenders to escape justice.

For policymakers and the broader real estate market, the case serves as a litmus test for the efficacy of the PMLA in not just prosecuting fraud, but in actively reversing its effects. If fully implemented, the restitution order could provide a blueprint for future cases involving large-scale corporate fraud and distressed assets, offering a pathway back to financial stability for victims of systemic misconduct.

Sources

This report draws on public press notes from the Enforcement Directorate, court filings from the Special Court (PMLA) in Gurugram, and records from the Central Bureau of Investigation.

CBIA Team profile image
by CBIA Team

Subscribe to New Posts

Lorem ultrices malesuada sapien amet pulvinar quis. Feugiat etiam ullamcorper pharetra vitae nibh enim vel.

Success! Now Check Your Email

To complete Subscribe, click the confirmation link in your inbox. If it doesn’t arrive within 3 minutes, check your spam folder.

Ok, Thanks

Read More